Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Plan-B Theatre: Amerigo
Posted
By Gavin Sheehan
on April 6, 2010, 3:00 AM
click to enlarge
Plan-B Theatre's current season has already turned out to be one of its most talked about, and looking to become one of its most successful. And with a few more productions still left of the bill, the next one takes a particular subject near to most of us. Our own country's existence.

--- The newest play Amerigo (April 8-18 in the Studio Theatre at the Rose Wagner) enters a discussion of the history and value of the "new world" from several viewpoints of historical figures, in an attempt to define what exactly we are as Americans and what we could become. Taking its own unique turn into the interactions and thoughts, the four characters at hand (Columbus, Amerigo, Machiavelli and Ines de la Cruz) explore the merits and disadvantages, all with a twist of humor and deprecation along the way. I got a chance to chat with playwright Eric Samuelsen, as well as old friends of the blog Deena Marie Manzanares and Matthew Ivan Bennett about the play's creation and production, plus a few thoughts on local theatre.
Eric
Samuelsen, Deena Marie Manzanares & Matthew Ivan
Bennett
click to enlarge
http://www.planbtheatrecompany.org/
Gavin:
Hey everyone. First first off, tell us a bit about
yourselves.
Eric:
I teach playwriting at BYU. I've been on the BYU faculty since 1992.
Before that, I taught at Wright State in Ohio, and before that, at
Indiana. I've always loved history, though: my PhD is in Theatre
History and Dramatic Literature. I don't have an MFA in playwriting,
like most university playwriting teachers. I used to be an actor, I'm
a director, I'm an Ibsen scholar and an Ibsen translator--in fact, my
translation of A Doll House is being done at UVU right now, running
concurrently with Amerigo. So I'm sort of a jack of all trades. I'm a
Mormon, and an active one. Married, four children. Politically
liberal, so, yeah, Mormon liberal living in Provo. I guess locally
I'm sort of known for my letters to the editor of Deseret News. I've
been pointing out what seems completely obvious: Glenn Beck's a
nincompoop. So that's sort of my hobby: pissing off Utah
conservatives.
Deena:
Well you know me as a local actress, model, BeanerLaRue on YouTube
and City Weekly videographer!
Matt:
As a kid I once flooded a cow pasture on purpose. Actually, I was
trying to create a pond by damming an irrigation ditch and the water
just happened to spill into the adjacent pasture. The farmer was
pissed. I knew that damming the ditch was wrong and stupid, but I
wanted a little pond! It seems I recall this story whenever I'm about
to say or write something I think will make me sound good (like when
I'm asked to write about myself for a blog...) What the story says
about me is that my curiosity is sometimes more muscular than my
reason.
click to enlarge
Gavin:
What inspired all you to take an interest in theater?
Matt:
My realistic answer: All the attention I got doing it as a young
person. My cynical answer: I became interested in theatre when I
realized I could lie and get away with it. My geeky answer: Reading
Shakespeare until my eyes hurt in my bedroom at 14, under a blue
light bulb, and imagining Rosemary Tonge (a crush) as Juliet got me
interested in it. (Note: I saw myself as Romeo, yes, but in my
imagination I had no dandruff and larger pectorals.)
Deena:
I always have been and always will be in love with the stage, first
and foremost. It's what I crave and where I get to dress up, play
pretend and escape awhile. Where I get my emotion out. Where I feel
beautiful and confident. Where I get a chance to tell a story to
others and perhaps have the kind of affect on a person or two that
seeing theatre had on me when I was little. A chance to leave a mark.
To change a life. It's what gets me. Down to my bones.
Eric:
My father's an opera singer, so I grew up with opera and theatre and
music, and I had small kid's roles in operas with my Dad--I was six
when I had a tiny walk-on in Peter Grimes, I remember. So in high
school in Indiana, I was a weird nerdy kid without any friends, but a
couple of teachers took an interest in me--my typing teacher (I
wanted to be a writer and back then, you took a typing class), was an
opera buff, got me into the school choir. My high school drama
teacher was this amazing alcoholic force of nature named Mary
Forester, who directed five plays a year and trolled the hallways of
the school looking for misfits and weirdos and putting them in shows.
She scooped me up in her net, cast me as Velasco in Barefoot in the
Park. And I fell in love. I've been a theatre geek ever
since.
click to enlarge
click to enlarge
Gavin:
Eric, how did the idea come about for this particular play?
Eric:
I've always been interested in Columbus, way back in '92 when
everyone was doing 500 year anniversary stuff, and there was this
huge debate about whether we should celebrate him as a great explorer
or attack him as a genocidist. I'd read a lot about him, and what
always interested me were his religious views, which were
idiosyncratic even by the standards of the 15th century. Plus he
liked a lot of the same scriptures Mormons tend to like. But I could
never figure out a way to write about him. A few years ago, I got to
thinking about Amerigo Vespucci, and I realized I didn't know very
much about the guy our two continents are named after, so I bought a
couple of books, and read them, and thought he was, if anything, more
interesting than Columbus. So I got the idea of putting the two of
them in a play. I took a couple of shots at it; wrote a draft, set in
the 15th century, but it wasn't very good. I do have two short scenes
from that play in this one, one in which Amerigo tries to talk
Columbus into going with him on his third voyage, and one between
Queen Isabella and one of her advisors. Meanwhile I saw Michael
Frayn's play Copenhagen in London, and then directed it at BYU, and
fell in love with that whole idea of building a play around an
historical debate. So I got the idea of doing this debate, Amerigo
vs. Columbus over who discovered America. Who should mediate? I love
Machiavelli, esp. when I read that Karl Rove reads The Prince
annually. And Machiavelli was a playwright--in fact, one draft of
Amerigo includes an excerpt from Machiavelli's The Mandrake--too
cumbersome to keep, but I still wish I could have made it work. But
what kept nagging at me was the need to include another perspective,
the perspective of native Americans. I thought of including Bartolome
de las Casas, the great preacher who argued against Columbus and the
entire conquest of the Americas. But I wanted the play to stay sort
of light in tone, and de las Casas, was too passionate to really
work. I also thought of including Montezuma, but I wanted the play to
read like a Renaissance debate, I wanted the characters to be
Europeans. Then I read Clive James wonderful book Cultural Amnesia,
and he has a chapter on Sor Juana and Octavio Paz. I'd read quite a
bit of Paz, but I didn't know his book about Sor Juana. So I was able
to find that and it really intrigued me, so I bought a book of her
poetry, and read her play, The Divine Narcissus. The Loa to that play
(a kind of introduction) included some lines she's translated from
Nahuatal, and they fit perfectly into what I wanted to do. So I had
my fourth character. I think in most respects, she's the most
important--she's the moral center of the play, certainly, and yet
she's also compromised, she's also a cultural imperialist, she
learns. That's the sin that's kept her in Purgatory. Why Purgatory? I
just love it, this half-way house, this interim place where you get
to spend thousands of years in penance. So I ended up with a play
that's pretty funny, I think, but also that deals with serious
issues. Plus, remember the Columbus debate: hero v. villain? Well,
that got politicized, with the right arguing for Columbus as a good
guy who did good things. Glenn Beck's really there; he's argued that
manifest destiny is an idea we need to revive, for example. So
indirectly, the play's kind of inspired by Glenn Beck. Just in the
sense that he's always trying to bring history in to support his
argument, but his version of history is really just a kind of hard
core American exceptionalism. To which, as an historian, I take
exception. Plus, dude, Glenn Beck's HILARIOUS. Especially when he
cries; I love it when he cries. I'm always reminded of Bill Murray in
"The Man Who Knew Too Little". "My dog . . . just died!" Bad
acting is always funny, and Beck is, first and foremost, a terrible
actor.
click to enlarge
click to enlarge
Gavin:
Considering the four people you chose to include from history, what
was it about each one that drew your attention and made you want to
include them as characters?
Eric:
They each represent something, a point of view about America.
Columbus represents America as an essentially religious construct, as
Zion, as Eden, as the shining city on a hill. Amerigo represents
America as primarily a land of commerce, a land where Adam Smith
rules. Machiavelli represents America as a political empire, as a
pragmatic superpower that has to do terrible things from time to time
to continue to hold onto power. And Sor Juana represents
multicultural America, tragic America, where great civilizations were
wiped out, where empires were built on slavery, but where there's
still some beauty in the new civilizations that rose from the ashes
of those that were destroyed. I do see them a bit as types more than
fully rounded characters. But I love Amerigo's wit, I love Columbus'
bullying ambition, I love Machiavelli's cool detached pragmatism, and
above all, I love Sor Juana's passion and moral centeredness.
Gavin: What
was it like for you researching the material on these figures and
creating their personalities for the roles?
Eric:
The research was just pure joy. I loved every second of it. I read
some twenty five or thirty books as research for this, and every
single one was wonderful--they were all well written, they were all
engaging. Something about American history leads to good writing,
I've decided. The writing of this play was really fun too--I kept
going back to it, just because it was so much fun. There were times
it was a little heart breaking: the Michele Cuneo part, where
Columbus' lieutenant describes his first encounter with a native
woman, and how he enjoyed raping and torturing her, that always gets
to me. But I got to write lyrically, I got to write comically, I got
to write tragically, and I got to quote some of my favorite plays
from ancient Greece. So the whole thing was just a ball.
click to enlarge
Gavin:
Matt and Deena, what was it about this particular play that caught
your eye to audition for it?
Deena:
I love words. The beauty and power of words. When I was asked to
read for it and had the script in my hand I fell in love with the
writing. I was in awe of Sor Juana, so flattered to be considered to
portray such a woman. What an opportunity it would be to speak these
lovely words as such a powerful and revered woman. Plus my dad is
Spanish, my mom Mexican... so my whole family is excited for this
one!
Matt:
Well, the role of Amerigo. He's a combination of snake oil and Han
Solo. He's the Han Solo of the late 15th Century. What
self-respecting nerd would pass on the opportunity to
audition?
Gavin:
What has it been like fitting into these unique roles, and what
challenges have you met in bringing out the character and perfecting
your performance?
Matt:
The biggest challenge, so far, has been tempering the snake oil with
genuineness. The most interesting thing to me in getting into the
role has been actually agreeing with his point of view. The more I
try on his unapologetic capitalism, the less crazy I think the
political right is -- and that's disturbing to me because I'm so
Communist I shit red. Just kidding. I just wanted to write that. But
seriously, as I play the part, the saying "It's just business"
makes more and more sense to me.
Deena:
I have never played someone who really lived before. I wanted to
come in with a clean slate, let my version of Sor Juna find me,
rather than play an idea of her. And of course, wanting to do her
great justice.
click to enlarge
Gavin:
How is the interaction between each other, along with Kirt and Mark,
and bringing this play to life?
Deena:
There's something different, again, that we're playing real people.
Speaking to Columbus one minute and Amerigo the next, while sharing a
glance with Machiavelli, it's very cool. Give me chills.
Matt:
We all seem to be in some way tailored to the play. Mark Fossen is
naturally eloquent and impassioned (like Columbus). Deena Marie is, I
think, naturally dignified and caring, and she's certainly gorgeous
(all like Sor Juana). Kirt Bateman is a natural mediator: he's merry,
to-the-point, and always practical (like Samuelsen's Machiavelli). And
it turns out Amerigo had exactly the same hair as me. So bringing it
to life, for all of us, has been pretty effortless.
Gavin:
Going into opening night, what are your overall thoughts on the
production?
Eric:
I've got a great cast, great designers, a great director. So if the
play doesn't work, it's my fault. So I'm scared shitless.
Deena:
To savor each performance. The run is short, so get your tickets
ASAP!
Matt:
Overall I'm thinking: the production is kismet. We all seem to be
learning something personal from the experience. That's my favorite
kind of theatre to do. I'm also thinking that Kirt Bateman is going
to make me snicker, and possibly totally break character, at least
once in the run.
click to enlarge
Gavin:
A bit state-wide, what are your thoughts on local theater, both good
and bad?
Matt:
Salt Lake theatre, it feels, has gotten better and better in my
lifetime in terms of diversity of voices and its contribution to
social discourse. The pure entertainment aspect of it has improved
too, it seems. What's missing, to me, in the Salt Lake theatre scene
is camaraderie. It's somewhat clique-ish, which I find unfortunate.
I've been saying that for a few years now and I haven't really seen
an improvement. But that doesn't seem to be in the way of new
companies striking out or brilliant work being done.
Deena:
It's small. So that's either a blessing or a curse. Knock on wood,
I've been very lucky to be able to do what I love professionally on a
regular basis.
Eric:
I think there's a lot of really good theatre being done in this
state, but mostly not in the big venues. I love SLAC, though I don't
get there for everything and should. In Provo, the best theatre
that's happening is being done by little groups like the New Play
Project. They just did a show, Little Happy Secrets, that's as good
as I've seen in years. And Scott Bronson has this tiny little space
tucked into a converted closet at the Covey Center for the Arts in
Provo, and he does these fantastic little shows, great work time and
time again. Even the Hale Center-Orem's improved a lot; I loved their
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels. Plan-B is best - I love Jerry's passionate
commitment to new plays. Bravo! I should also mention college
theatre. BYU does good work, and right now UVU's kicking our ass.
Chris Clark and John Graham and Dave Tinney are amazing
directors.
Gavin:
Is there anything you believe could be done to improve it?
Eric:
Publicity! I mean, I want to know what's happening in those little
100-seat black boxes. That's when theatre REALLY gets exciting.
Deena: It
would be great if there was more professional theatre in town so more
of SLC's equity actors could have consistent work.
click to enlarge
Gavin:
What's your take on the recent push to bring “Broadway to
Utah”?
Matt:
Meh. I'm glad for it, I guess. "Broadway" in "Broadway
to Utah" mostly means producing big-butt, PG musical spectacles
that both the Quorum of the Twelve and volunteers at the Pride Center
will buy a ticket to. I usually want to see about 1 in 4 of the
Broadway plays that come here, but usually don't see unless I'm
offered a free ticket. Don't get me wrong though, my spine tingles as
much as the next person in response to tap shoes.
Eric:
I'm pretty indifferent. Big touring companies doing tired old
Broadway standards? Ho. Hum.
Gavin:
What can we expect from all of you over the rest of the
year?
Deena:
As far as theatre goes, And
The Banned Slammed On at Plan-B on May
1st; a staged reading of Persian Quarter at SLAC on April 26; and
Hair this summer at the Egyptian Theatre.
Matt:
Mostly you can expect me to cloistered with a jar of almond butter
and carrots, writing my next two plays. On June 2nd there's a reading
of a one-act of mine at Plan-B. I'll probably have a one-act produced
with the Theatre Arts Conservatory later in the year. Oh yeah, and
there's And
The Banned Slammed On.
Eric:
Gosh, well. I'm directing a children's show, Mysteries Of Monster Grove, at BYU in May. Love it, we adapted it from some stories by
Rick Walton, and it's terrific fun. Scott Bronson's little theatre is
doing my play The Plan sometime next year; they've committed to doing
it, but it's still TBA. New Play Project is doing a play of mine,
Mess Of Pottage, again TBA. Of course, I'm really excited about
Borderlands at Plan-B, same time next year as Amerigo. UVU's doing my
translation of A Doll's House. Colleen Lewis' Theatre Arts
Conservatory will be doing my play Bumps. And I'm just finishing a
novel.
click to enlarge
Gavin:
Aside from the obvious, is there anything you'd like to promote or
plug?
Eric: Mysteries
Of Monster Grove. It's really just pure fun. A lot of
children's theatre is messagy, didactic. I hated that when I was a
kid, and we're not doing it now. It's just a fun play about a family
who moves to Monster Grove.
Deena:
Visit my website for current projects,
photos, buzz, links and more. Also, I just shot my first centerfold
for a pinup magazine, Sunday Slacker. Get a copy!
Matt:
I'd like to take this opportunity to promote Kirt Bateman's utter
lack of believability as a jailer in Amerigo. On the surface that
sounds like a dig, but it's actually a high compliment, you'll see.
Tags: Plan-B Theatre, Amerigo, Image