There are always angry questions
bandied about in the wake of any
work by Sacha Baron Cohen, but I
don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone ask this
one: “How far should we be expected to
dumb down movies?” That’s what I always
wonder when I hear those complaints about
Cohen’s work that generally amount to this:
“Not everyone is smart enough to appreciate
the subtleties of his humor, so isn’t that
a bad thing? Shouldn’t we make sure that
no one misinterprets Cohen’s satire?”
Is this really how low we’ve sunk?
Is Cohen’s character in Bruno—ostensibly
an Austrian fashion guru and TV personality—
an outrageous stereotype of homosexuality
as much as a means to send up the
idiocies of high fashion? Yes, without question.
It’s equally apparent that Bruno is not
meant to send up homosexuals, but rather
the sort of narrow-minded bigotry that corners
a dude into escaping into in-your-face
outrageousness in the first place. The fake
working title of this movie, after all, was
Bruno: Delicious Journeys Through America
for the Purpose of Making Heterosexual Males
Visibly Uncomfortable in the Presence of a Gay
Foreigner in a Mesh T-Shirt, and that’s a perfect
description—though perhaps it would be
more fair to say “Homophobic Heterosexual
Males.” Possibly, it’s worth asking whether
American bigotry, self-centeredness and
pettiness is a fair target for a British comedian.
But, when the United States is the trendsetter
in global pop culture that’s probably a
question easily batted away.
Cohen’s daring as a cultural critic is in
as grand a form here as it was in Borat, his
last brilliant adventure in courting physical
assault and civil lawsuits in the name of lampooning
American knee-jerk ignorance and
superficiality. And it’s not that Americans
are the only ones to whom such labels could
be applied—just that we’re the biggest target,
and have only made ourselves so.
Bruno travels to Los Angeles after
having been summarily dismissed from
European fashion circles, in search of
fame and fortune in the New World,
where he finds the natives as shallow
and as status-obsessed as he is. If
we didn’t already know such places were
real, wouldn’t we find the anal-bleaching
salon he visits almost too preposterous to
believe? Anal? Bleaching? Shudder.
Perhaps the overarching theme of
Bruno is that there is apparently nothing
so extreme you can tell Americans that
they will not believe—such as that a flamboyant
gay Austrian looking to expand his
celebrity would buy an African child. The
unspoken critique: Why do we celebrate
Brad and Angelina for importing children
if it’s wrong for people whose names we
don’t know to do the same? But even more
than critiquing the credulity of Americans
in a world absurd enough to contain anal-bleaching
salons, Bruno asks, “How did we
let such a world come to be?”
As Bruno cruises Los Angeles and then
expands out into middle America, the questions
multiply: Why do we accept a world
in which people are dehumanized to the
point where no one questions babies being
used as status symbols, people being used
as furniture, bigotries being used to divide
us? Why do we accept a world in which being
on camera is so vital that no one—not even
those whose reputations could be dinged by
being punked by a punk like Cohen—does
the slightest bit of research into who is asking
for an interview? Why do we accept a
world in which doing good—as for a charity—is inevitably turned into good PR?
I don’t want to spoil which deserving
targets get the Cohen treatment, but I will
say this: He is fearless as a performer,
comedian and cultural observer. There’s
no boundary or taboo it seems he will not
challenge, and at points his audacity gets
damned near profound. During a quick
sojourn to the Middle East, he laments that
he “doesn’t have enough Ecstasy for everyone”
to solve the political crises there, and
it makes you wonder whether, if he did and
everyone could just chill, it might actually
work. When so many public figures
are deliberately shocking and offensive
because they want us to join them in being
small, mean, petty and tribal—I’m thinking
of the likes of Ann Coulter and Rush
Limbaugh—Cohen is doing so for the very
opposite reasons. And that is a good thing,
and a thing very much worth celebrating.
Oh, and it’s outrageously funny to
watch, too.
BRUNO
TRY THESE
Ali G Indahouse (2002) Sacha Baron Cohen Emilio Rivera Rated R |
|
Borat (2006) Sacha Baron Cohen Ken Davitian Rated R |
|
Talladega Nights (2006) Will Ferrell Sacha Baron Cohen Rated PG-13 |
|
Religulous (2008) Bill Maher Rated R |